ISMJ

International SportMed Journal

Original research article

The effects of an eight-week step-aerobic dance exercise programme on body composition parameters in middle-aged sedentary obese women

*Dr Fatma Arslan, PhD

Department of Coaching and Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey

*Corresponding author. Address at the end of text

Abstract

Background: Regular physical activity leads to significant changes in terms of the reduction of health-related risks. Research question:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an eight-week step-aerobic dance exercise programme on weight loss and body composition parameters in middle-aged sedentary obese women. Type of study: This study comprised an eight-week randomised controlled trial. Methods: A total of 49 healthy sedentary obese women participated in this study voluntarily. They were randomly divided into two groups: those undertaking a step-aerobic dance exendex (BMI), weight, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, four-site skinfold thickness, fat percentage, basal metabolic rate and lean body mass were assessed before and after the completion of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme. Results: After the eight weeks of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme, significant differences were found in the subjects' weight, BMI, body composition parameters, waist-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference (WC), fat percentage, lean body mass (LBM) and basal metabolic rate (BMR) in the experimental group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the control group after the experiment in terms of the same measures (P>0.05). Conclusion: The step aerobic dance programme proved to be a useful exercise modality for weight loss and in terms of body crcise programme (n=29) and a control group (n=20). The subjects too part in a step-aerobic dance exercise programme for one hour per day, three days a week for eight weeks. The subjects' Body Mass Iomposition. There was a clear response to the eight-week step aerobic dance programme in terms of central obesity in sedentary obese Turkish women. Keywords: step exercises; aerobic dance; obese; body composition; weight loss

Download PDF

 

Dr Fatma Arslan, PhD

Dr Arslan graduated from the Department of Physical Education and Sport, Seljuk University Konya,Turkey. She has a PhD from the Institute of Health Sciences, Physical Education and Sport Science, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. Her main research interests are physical education, collective health, the science of training, posture and proprioception. She is also an international-level instructor in taekwondo, kick boxing and step-aerobic dance.

Introduction

A sedentary lifestyle poses a threat to individuals' health because it can lead to an increase or progression in the risk of hypertension, obesity, muscle weakness, postural defects, diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) in middle-aged people1. The prevalence of obesity is continuing to rise in developing countries2. Obesity is known to be closely associated with some major health risk factors, such as CHD and certain metabolic disorders3,4. Waist circumference (WC), waist-hip ratio (WHR) and anthropometric index values are used extensively for the detection of central obesity5,6. In addition, abdominal obesity and the predication of obesity-related health risks were assessed by measuring WC7,8. BMI is also one of the most widely used indices of relative weight9. Generally, the evidence has shown that using WC with BMI in order to estimate health-related risks is better than using BMI alone10,11.

 

Physical activity is a vital part of a comprehensive weight loss and weight control programme. As a result of physical activity, abdominal fat may decrease, cardiorespiratory fitness may increase, and weight loss in overweight and obese adults can be achieved12. Step aerobics has become gradually more popular in fitness and weight loss programmes13. Step aerobics is a combination of low-impact aerobic dance movements and step aerobics.

 

Step aerobics and aerobic dance have been combined with the purpose of achieving maximum aerobic effects. The choreography is repeated several times to music and uses different movements in an appropriate sequence. It is suitable for most groups, from beginners to advanced exercisers, and even top level athletes. It is also recommended by the ACSM (American College of Sport Medicine)14 and Pollock et al.15. In order to improve cardiorespiratory endurance, control body weight and reduce the risk of premature chronic disease, an individual should perform 20 to 60 minutes of continuous or intermittent aerobic exercise at an intensity of between 50% and 85% of their maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), three to five days per week13,14,15. Olson et al. has mentioned that aerobic bench-step exercises provide sufficient cardiorespiratory demand to enhance aerobic fitness and promote weight loss in females13.

 

Therefore the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an eight-week step-aerobic dance exercise programme on weight loss, body mass, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio in sedentary obese women.

 

Methods

Sample

In this study, a total of 49 healthy sedentary obese Turkish women participated in the study. They had no previous experience of any sport/exercise andregistered for the first time in a fitness centre, in Konya, Turkey. They were asked to maintain their usual diet and family behaviour for the duration of the exercise programme. The women were randomly divided into experimental and control groups respectively. The average age and height of the subjects were 41.55 ± 6.72years-old and 1.59 ± 7.19cm (n=29) for the experimental group and 37.00 ± 9.09years-old and 1.61 ± 6.34cm (n=20) for the control group.

All of the procedures of this study were approved by the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Selcuklu Medical Sciencesunder protocol no. 280/2009 of Seljuk University in Konya, Turkey. The subjects were informed about the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all. The measurements were taken twice, before and after the completion of a step-aerobic exercise programme which was applied over a period of eight weeks, with one-hour step-aerobic exercise classes, three days per week. The control group did not participate in the step-aerobic exercise programme during the eight-week period. All measurements were recorded at baseline and immediately after the study

 

Data collection

Height was measured to the nearest 0.1cm on a stadiometer when the participants were shoeless. Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1kg using a pre-calibrated Tanita instrument (model TBF-305; Tanita, Arlington Heights, IL) electronic scale. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height squared (kg/m2) in metres. BMI was then categorised according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization:16 below-normal weight (<18.5kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9kg/m2), obese (30.0-39.9kg /m2), and extremely obese (40kg/m2).

The subjects were asked to breathe out for measurement of their WC, which was measured to the nearest 0.1cm at the iliac crest17. When viewed from the side, hip circumference was evaluated at the level of the maximum extension of the thigh, and waist-hip ratio (WHR) equals the waist circumference divided by the hip circumference; WC (cm)/height (m).

Skinfold thickness was determined from four skinfold sites measured with the Holtain skinfold calliper. These sites were the biceps (the anterior surface of the biceps, midway between the anterior auxiliary fold and the antecubital fossa), triceps (the vertical fold on the posterior midline of the upper arm, halfway between the acromion and olecranon process), subscapular (the fold on the diagonal line coming from the vertebral border to between 1- and 2cm from the inferior angle of the scapulae) and the suprailiac (the diagonal fold above the iliac crest with the anterior auxiliary line).

 

Interventions

Initially, the aim of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme was for the subjects to achieve a heart rate of 50-60% of the maximal heart rate for their age. The target then was to raise their heart rate to 70-80% of the maximal heart rate for their age. The step-aerobic dance exercise programme was performed by all of the subjects in the experimental group for the entire eight week period. The exercises were choreographed by a professional step-aerobic dance coach. The movements were simplified and made easy to learn, and required the use of both the upper and lower extremities and the back. Verbal and tactile prompts were given during each step-aerobic dance exercise class. The subjects in the experimental group participated in three 40-minute sessions per week for four weeks initially, followed by three 50-minute sessions per week for another four weeks. For the first four weeks, each session consisted of 10 minutes of warming up, 30 minutes of aerobic dancing with brief resting periods, followed by 10 minutes to cool down. For the following four weeks, step aerobics was added to the aerobic dance movements, and the sessions were lengthened from 40 to 50 minutes each, while the warming up and cooling down times remained the same for the eight weeks. The choreographed exercise programme consisted of stretching exercises, walking exercises and progressive step-aerobic movements. It was performed with music, and required the continuous use of extended arm movements and the involvement of the major muscle groups. The control group did not participate in the step-aerobic dance exercise programme during the eight-week period18,19. The outline of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Step-aerobic exercise programme format

Basic movements for aerobics

Basic movements for step

Repetitions

March

Basic step

8

Running

Wide step

8

Step touch

Tap up,tap down

8

Step touches fron and back

Knee lift

8

Double step touch

Leg curl

8

Grapevine

Leg opening side and back

8

Side to side

Kick

8

Knee lift

Knee lift and Leg curl repeater

8

Leg curl

Straddle up-down

8

Leg opening side and back

Turn step

8

Kick side and front

Turn travel

8

Lunge side and back

Over the top

8

Squat

Across the top

8

Slide

Corner to corner

8

Jumping jacks

Lunge

8

Jumping (knee to chest)

Reverse step

8

 

Statistical analysis

The statistical software program (SPSS version 15.0) was used for data analysis. Standard statistical methods were used for the calculation of means and standard deviation (SD). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether the dependent variables were normally distributed. The Levene test was used to determine whether or not there was homogeneity of variance. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was run on each of the dependent variables. For all analyses, the criterion for significance was set at an alpha level of p<0.05.

Results

Table 2 summarises the anthropometrical data of all subjects.

Table 2: Data summary for the experimental and control groups

Variable

Experimental group (n=29)

Control group (n = 20

M ± SD

M ± SD

Age (years)

41.55±6.72

37.00±9.09

Height (m)

1.59±7.19

1.61±6.34

Weight (kg)

85.97±9.60

84.50±10.18

As shown in Table 2, the mean (SD) age is 41.55 ± 6.72years, body height is 1.59 ± 7.19m, and weight is 85.97 ± 9.60kg for the experimental group. For the control group, the mean (SD) age is 37.00 ± 9.09years, body height is 1.61 ± 6.34m, and weight is 84.50 ± 10.18kg.

Table 3: Comparison of the experimental group and control groups at pre-test and post-test respectively

 

Variables

Groups

Pre-test

Post-test

n

Mean±SD

T

p

Mean±SD

T

p

Weight (kg)

Experimental group

29

85.97±9.60

0.513

 

0.611

 

83.31±10.16

-0.495

0.623

Control group

20

84.50±10.17

84.80±10.65

Body mass index

Experimental group

29

33.99±3.89

1.777

 

0.082

32.93±3.96

0.521

0.605

Control group

20

32.30±2.05

32.41±2.32

Waist circumference

Experimental group

29

102.66±8.43

3.565

0.001*

96.38±8.16

0.838

0.406

Control group

20

94.50±6.96

94.55±6.43

Waist-hip ratio

Experimental group

29

0.85±0.06

-17.427

0.000*

0.82±0.05

-18.130

0.000*

Control group

20

1.23±0.10

1.23±0.11

Biceps

Experimental group

29

22.17±5.56

-0.577

0.567

19.90±4.95

-1.900

0.064

Control group

20

23.30±8.15

23.45±8.15

Triceps

Experimental group

29

31.03±5.23

1.140

0.260

27.59±4.94

-0.863

0.392

Control group

20

29.00±7.28

29.10±7.35

Supscapula

Experimental group

29

30.21±5.67

1.005

0.320

26.38±5.86

-1.259

0.214

Control group

20

28.50±6.10

28,60±6,36

Suprailiac

Experimental group

29

26.31±5.76

-0.598

0.553

23.69±5.70

-2.091

0.042*

Control group

20

27.40±6.94

27.50±7.02

Fat percentage

Experimental group

29

39.32±2.64

0.573

0.569

37.56±2.49

-1.557

0.126

Control group

20

38.82±3.41

38.87±3.41

Basal metabolic rate

Experimental group

29

1577.00±105.74

-0.337

0.738

1551.62±104.76

-1.153

0.255

Control group

20

1588.44±131.41

1591.31±136.09

Lean body mass

Experimental group

29

49.56±2.52

-0.269

0.789

48.75±2.62

-1.214

0.231

Control group

20

49.80±3.64

49,86±3,80

Metabolic rat

Experimental group

29

1590.35±55.39

-0.269

0.789

1572.41±57.69

-1.214

0.231

Control group

20

1595.55±80.11

1596.86±83.50

Hips circumferenc

Experimental group

29

122.17±8.05

2.701

0.010*

116.00±8.22

-0.042

0.967

Control group

20

116.15±7.08

116.10±8.30

In Table 3, a significant difference between the experimental and control groups was found only for the waist-hip ratio in the pre-test and post-test (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups for weight, body mass index, biceps, triceps, subscapula, fat percentage, basal metabolic rate, lean body mass, and metabolic rate pre-test and post-test (p>0.05) respectively.

Table 4: Comparison of the pre-test and post-test measurements with respect to experimental and control groups respectively

 

Groups

Variables

Pre-test

Post-test

T

p

Mean±SD

Mean±SD

 

 

 

Experimental

Group (n=29)

Weight

85.97±9.60

83.31±10.16

4.687

0.000

Body mass index

33.99±3.89

32.93±3.96

4.503

0.000

Biceps

22.17±5.56

19.90±4.95

2.424

0.022

Triceps

31.04±5.23

27.59±4.94

3.140

0.004

Subscapula

30.21±5.67

26.38±5.86

3.449

0.002

Fat percentage

39.32±2.64

37.56±2.49

3.435

0.002

Basal metabolic rate

1577.00±105.74

1551.62±104.76

4.687

0.000

Lean body mass

49.56±2.52

48.75±2.62

4.178

0.000

Metabolic rate

1590.35±55.39

1572.41±57.69

4.178

0.000

 

 

Control

Group (n=20)

Weight

84.50±10.17

84.80±10.65

-0.670

0.511

Body mass index

32.30±2.05

32.41±2.32

-0.636

0.532

Biceps

23.30±8.15

23.45±8.15

-1.831

0.083

Triceps

29.00±7.28

29.10±7.36

-1.453

0.163

Subscapula

28.50±6.10

28.60±6.36

-1.285

0.214

Fat percentage

38.82±3.41

38.87±3.41

-3.043

0.007

Basal metabolic rate

1588.44±131.41

1591.31±136.09

-0.670

0.511

Lean body mass

49.80±3.64

49.86±3.79

-0.462

0.649

Metabolic rate

1595.55±80.11

1596.86±83.50

-0.462

0.649

Significant differences were shown between pre-test and post-test for weight, body mass index, biceps, triceps, subscapula, fat percentage, basal metabolic rate lean body mass, and metabolic rate in the experimental group shown in Table 4 (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were found between pretest and posttest for weight, body mass index, biceps, triceps, subscapula, basal metabolic rate lean body mass, and metabolic rate in the control group (p>0.05). There was a significant difference only for fat percentage in control group (Table 4) (p < 0.05).

Table 5: ANCOVA results of the post-test corrected from the pre-test for the experimental and control groups respectively

Variables

Source of variance

Type III sum of Squares

Mean square

F

P

Waist circumference

Covariate

1876.29

1876.29

111.59

0.000

Effect of experiment

207.35

207.35

12.33

0.001

Hip circumference

Covariate

2659.77

2659.77

227.40

0.000

Effect of experiment

369.48

369.48

31.59

0.000

Waist-hip ratio

Covariate

0.22

0.22

149.92

0.000

Effect of experiment

0.007

0.007

4.65

0.036

Suprailiac

Covariate

987.78

987.78

52.87

0.000

Effect of experiment

109.05

109.05

5.84

0.000

There were statistically detected significant differences with covariance analyses in the effect of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme for waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio and the suprailiac in the experimental and control groups respectively, indicating a positive effect from the step-aerobic dance exercise programme.(Table 5) (p<0.05).

Discussion

Regular physical activity leads to significant changes in terms of increased healthrelated fitness and can reduce risk factors for developing a range of disabling medical conditions which occur in inactive people20. In general, exercise is beneficial for health and physical fitness, while a sedentary lifestyle has a negative effect on a person's well-being. The present study investigated the effects of an eight-week step-aerobic dance exercise programme in terms of the effect on weight loss, body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio in middle-aged sedentary obese women.

The exercise programme resulted in a mean weight loss of 2.66kg, a decrease in the subjects' BMI and a decrease in their total body fat percentage when compared to control group. Circumference measurements also showed that those of the step-aerobic dance group's were more significant than for the control group (p< 0.05). These results were similar to those found in the studies by McCord et al. and Carol et al respectively. They reported a reduction in body weight and fat composition after an eight- to 12-week step-aerobic exercise and dance programme20,21.

According to the data, a significant difference was found between the pre- and post-test values for body weight, BMI, biceps, triceps, subscapula, fat percentage, basal metabolic rate and lean body mass in the experimental group (p< 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences between the means of the pre- and post-tests body weight, BMI, biceps, triceps, subscapula, basal metabolic rate and lean body mass of the control group (p> 0.05), although there was a significant difference in the fat percentage of the control group. It was expected that there would be a significant difference in the body weight, body composition parameters and fat percentage by the end of the eight-week step-aerobic dance programme in the experimental group. A number of studies have mentioned that body weight and body composition changes as a result of physical training23,24,25. In addition, Akdur et al.26 found that a step-aerobics group experienced greater weight loss, BMI decrease and total body fat percentage decrease when compared to a diet-only group. Circumference measurements also showed that decreases in the step-aerobic group were more significant than in the diet-only group26. These results are similar to the results of this present study. Thus t can be stated that a step-aerobic dance programme is an effective method of reducing body weight, BMI, biceps, triceps, subscapula, fat percentage, basal metabolic rate and lean body mass.

According to the results of the ANCOVA test, another important finding of this study was that four independent measures (WC, hips circumference, waist-hips ratio and suprailiac skinfolds) demonstrated a strong response to the effects of the step-aerobic dance exercise programme. There were improvements in all of these measures. Significant differences between the pretests and posttests for WC, hip circumference, waist-hips ratio and suprailiac skinfolds in the experimental group (p<0.05) were found. In addition, the absolute WC (>102 cm in men and >88 cm in women) and the waist-hip ratio(the circumference of the waist divided by that of the hips: >0.9 for men and >0.85 for women), were both used as measures of central obesity27. The eight-week step-aerobic dance programme was found to have an effect on central obesity.

Irwin et al.27 reported that an increase in the duration (mins/week) of physical activity was significantly associated with a reduction in the subjects' total fat. Amano et al.28 applied aerobic exercises in a three months series of 30 minute sessions on three days per week with obese subjects. They found a significant difference between the subjects' average weight, BMI, fat body percentage and lean body mass before and after training. While there was no significant difference in lean body mass, a significant difference was observed for all of the other variables28. In another study29, it was found that a culturally-specific dance intervention significantly influenced the body fat and BMI of sedentary African-American women over an eight-week period. This difference was maintained at 18 weeks when compared to the participants who did not take part in the intervention29. Other dance studies have reported a decrease in the body fat and BMI of sedentary obese women who danced two to three times per week for 12 weeks30.

As a result, WC and waist-hip ratio is very important for the detection of central obesity. The most important finding of the present study was that there was a clear response to the effects of the eight-week step-aerobic dance programme on central obesity. In addition, there was an important development in body composition values, BMI, the amount of weight change, lean body mass and the basal metabolic rate of sedentary middle-aged obese females. These positive changes in body composition were more pronounced following the implementation of the step-aerobic dance programme with obese middle-aged women in this study. Thus this research demonstrated that a step-aerobic dance programme is a useful exercise modality for weight loss and body composition in Turkish obese, sedentary middle-aged women.

Address for correspondence:

Dr Fatma Arslan, Department of Coaching and Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey.

Email: fatmaarslan2003@yahoo.comfarslan@kmu.edu.tr

References

  1. WHO. Obesity: Priority and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. 2004 Geneva, (WHO Technical Report Series 894).  
  2. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of Obesity, Diabetes, and Obesity-Related Health Risk Factors, 2001. J Am Med Assoc 2003;  289: 76–79.
  3. Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, et al. Obesity and the risk of heart failure. N Engl J Med2002;  347: 305–313.
  4. Rexrode KM, Hennekens CH, Willett WC, et al. A prospective study of body mass index, weight change, and risk of stroke in women. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277: 1539–1545.
  5. Gillum,RF, Mussolino ME, Madans JH. Body fat distribution and hypertension incidence in women and men: The NHANES Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1998; 22: 127–134.
  6. Rexrode KM, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, et al. Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 280: 1843–1848.
  7. WHO. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1998.
  8. Zhu S, Wang Z, Heshka S, et al. Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Clinical Action Thresholds. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76:743–749.
  9. Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, et al. Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chronic Dis 1972; 25:329.
  10. Ardern CI, Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I,et al. Discrimination of health risk by combined body mass index and waist circumference, Obes Res 2003; 11:135–142.
  11. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body Mass Index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health Guidelines. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:2074–2079.
  12. NHLBI Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidencereport. Obes Res 1998;6(Suppl. 2): 51–209.
  13. Olson MS, Williford HN, Blessing DL, et al. The cardiovascular and metabolic effects of bench stepping exercise in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23(11):1311-1318.
  14. ACSM: American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000.
  15. Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, et al. The recommended quality and quantity of exercise for developing and maintaining cardio-respiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 975-991.
  16. WHO. Consultation on Obesity. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; (WHO Technical Report Series 894) 2000.
  17. Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–94): Reference manuals and reports. Weighting and estimation methodology report [CD-ROM]. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
  18. Skelly WA, Darby LA, Phıllıps K.Physiological and biomechanical responses to three different landing surfaces during step aerobics. J Exerc Physiol Online 2003; 6(2): 70-79. http://www.muglacimnastik.com/index_files/Accessdate20.01.2010
  19. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, Washington 2008.
  20. Carol EG, Julie S, McKinney MS, et al. Is aerobic dance an effective alternative to walk-jog exercise training, J Sports Med Phys Fitness1992; 32: 136-141
  21. McCord P, Nicholas JC, Setterlund SJ. The effects of step training with and without hand weights. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1993; 33:348-358. Incorrect reference!!
  22. Fatouros IG, Taxildaris K, Tokmakidis SP, et al.  The effect of strength training, cardiovascular training and their combination on flexibility of inactive older adults, Int J Sports Med 2002; 23(2):112-119.
  23. Forbes, GB. Exercise and body composition. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70:997-997.
  24. King AC, Tribble, Dl. The role of exercise in weight regulation in nonathletes. Sports Med 1991; 11(5):331-349.
  25. Akdur H, Sozen AB, Yiğit Z, et al. The effect of walking and step aerobic exercise on physical fitness parameters in obese women, J Ist Facult Med 2007; 70:64-69.
  26. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937–952.
  27. Irwin ML, Yasui Y, Ulrich CM, et al. Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 323–330.
  28. Amano M, Kanda T, Maritani T. Exercise training and autonomic nervous system activity in obese individuals, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33(8): 1287-1291.
  29. Murrock CJ, Gary FA. Culturally specific dance to reduce obesity in African American women. Health Promot Pract. 2010;11(4):465-473.
  30. Shimamoto H, Adachi Y, Takahaski M, et al. Low impact aerobic dance as a useful exercise mode for reducing body mass index in mildly obese middle-aged women. Appl Human Sci 1998; 3: 109-114.